BKMC vs. BKGI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. BKMC is passively managed, while BKGI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKMC returned 15.64%/yr vs 22.11%/yr for BKGI. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKMC charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.

Performance

BKMC vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than BKGI's 12.30% return.

BKMC

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 6M: 9.13%
• 1Y: 21.96%
• 3Y*: 15.64%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: —

BKGI

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -2.97%
• YTD: 12.30%
• 6M: 12.73%
• 1Y: 20.53%
• 3Y*: 22.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKMC vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	11.34%	8.74%	13.78%	17.50%	3.31%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	12.30%	37.53%	12.35%	9.72%	8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BKMC and BKGI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022	0.57

The correlation between BKMC and BKGI shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKMC vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKMC	BKGI
Industrials	22.7%	11.8%
Technology	16.6%	-
Financial Services	12.7%	-
Healthcare	11.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	-
Real Estate	8.2%	18.1%
Basic Materials	4.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Communication Services	3.6%	2.7%
Energy	3.3%	20.6%
Utilities	2.4%	46.8%

Return for Risk

BKMC vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMC

BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 46
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 59
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKMC vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKMC	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.78	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.47	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.35	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	10.49	-1.89

BKMC vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKMC and BKGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKMC vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and BKGI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKMC	BKGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.02%	-14.79%	-10.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-6.16%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.68%	-14.16%	-9.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-3.05%	+1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-2.56%	-3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	1.96%	+0.60%

Volatility

BKMC vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 3.29%. This indicates that BKMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKMC	BKGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	3.29%	+1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.45%	9.27%	+2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.47%	11.64%	+3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.84%	14.02%	+4.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.15%	14.02%	+5.13%

BKMC vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKMC vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BKGI's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.69%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	1.38%	1.35%	1.54%	1.38%	1.63%	1.15%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKMC and BKGI in my portfolio?

BKMC and BKGI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKMC or BKGI?

BKMC has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to BKGI (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKMC dropped -25.02% vs BKGI's -14.79%.

Which ETF is better, BKMC or BKGI?

On 3-year performance, BKGI leads with 22.11% vs 15.64% for BKMC. On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKGI has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKMC or BKGI?

Over the 3-year period, BKGI has performed better with a 22.11% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKMC or BKGI?

BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKMC or BKGI?

BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.38% for BKMC.

What is the main difference between BKMC and BKGI?

BKMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BKGI is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKMC and 0.65% for BKGI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.