BKMC vs. BEDY
BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while BEDY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. BKMC is passively managed, while BEDY is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BKMC charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BEDY.
Performance
BKMC vs. BEDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than BEDY's 10.40% return.
BKMC
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- —
BEDY
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKMC vs. BEDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 11.31% | -0.35% |
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 10.40% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMC and BEDY is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMC vs. BEDY — Risk / Return Rank
BKMC
BEDY
BKMC vs. BEDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKMC | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMC | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 2.27 | -1.44 |
Drawdowns
BKMC vs. BEDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, which is greater than BEDY's maximum drawdown of -6.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and BEDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMC | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -6.25% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.33% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -1.36% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility
BKMC vs. BEDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMC | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 11.98% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 11.98% | +6.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 11.98% | +7.18% |
BKMC vs. BEDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMC vs. BEDY - Dividend Comparison
BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BEDY's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 3.35% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMC and BEDY have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BEDY.
BEDY has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 1.38% for BKMC.
BKMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BEDY is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKMC and 0.50% for BEDY.
Find the right allocation for BKMC and BEDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer