BKGI vs. YCS
BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). BKGI is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKGI returned 22.14%/yr vs 19.84%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. BKGI charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
BKGI vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKGI achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.
BKGI
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 21.78%
- 3Y*
- 22.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
BKGI vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 12.20% | 37.53% | 12.35% | 9.72% | 8.54% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | -21.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKGI and YCS is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2022 | -0.24 |
The correlation between BKGI and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to -0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKGI vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
BKGI
YCS
BKGI vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKGI | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 1.92 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 2.44 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 3.97 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 12.40 | -0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKGI | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.92 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.33 | +1.28 |
Drawdowns
BKGI vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKGI drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKGI and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKGI | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.79% | -49.56% | +34.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.16% | -8.30% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.16% | -23.05% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | 0.00% | -3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -19.93% | +17.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 2.66% | -0.79% |
Volatility
BKGI vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that BKGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKGI | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 2.75% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 12.32% | -3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.59% | 17.27% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 21.10% | -7.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 19.01% | -4.94% |
BKGI vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKGI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKGI vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
BKGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 2.69% | 2.65% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 0.53% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKGI and YCS have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKGI has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKGI dropped -14.79% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 3-year performance, BKGI leads with 22.14% vs 19.84% for YCS. On fees, BKGI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BKGI has performed better with a 22.14% return vs 19.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKGI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
BKGI is categorized as Energy Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKGI and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKGI and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer