PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKGI vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKGI vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKGI achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -31.71% return.


BKGI

1D
0.31%
1M
1.38%
6M
12.05%
YTD
14.63%
1Y
23.16%
3Y*
21.51%
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
7.64%
1M
37.45%
6M
-8.12%
YTD
-31.71%
1Y
257.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKGI vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
14.63%37.53%0.01%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-31.71%-44.36%-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BKGI and SMST is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKGI vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKGI
BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKGI vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKGISMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

3.04

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.31

5.82

+5.50

BKGI vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKGI Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKGI and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKGI vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKGI drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKGI and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKGISMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-99.25%

+84.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.16%

-85.39%

+79.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-97.32%

+96.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-90.93%

+88.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

44.56%

-42.51%

Volatility

BKGI vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) is 3.54%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 55.38%. This indicates that BKGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKGISMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

55.38%

-51.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

135.32%

-125.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

149.40%

-137.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

167.53%

-153.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.99%

167.53%

-153.54%

BKGI vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKGI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKGI vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

BKGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
2.88%2.65%4.55%4.55%0.53%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKGI and SMST have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (55.38%) compared to BKGI (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKGI dropped -14.79% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 257.89% vs 23.16% for BKGI. On fees, BKGI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BKGI has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 257.89% return vs 23.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKGI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

BKGI is categorized as Energy Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKGI and 1.29% for SMST.

BKGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKGI and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer