BKGI vs. MLPI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) and MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKGI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

BKGI vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKGI achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly lower than MLPI's 19.61% return.

BKGI

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -2.97%
• YTD: 12.30%
• 6M: 12.73%
• 1Y: 20.53%
• 3Y*: 22.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPI

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 19.61%
• 6M: 18.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKGI vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	12.30%	1.16%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	19.61%	0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BKGI and MLPI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

BKGI vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 59
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 62

MLPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKGI vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKGI	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.49	—	—

Drawdowns

BKGI vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKGI drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKGI and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKGI	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.79%	-5.38%	-9.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.05%	-2.18%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.56%	-1.49%	-1.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKGI	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.64%	13.05%	-1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.02%	13.05%	+0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.02%	13.05%	+0.97%

BKGI vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKGI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKGI vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

BKGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than MLPI's 7.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.69%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	7.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKGI and MLPI in my portfolio?

BKGI and MLPI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKGI or MLPI?

On fees, BKGI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKGI or MLPI?

BKGI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKGI or MLPI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 2.69% for BKGI.

What is the main difference between BKGI and MLPI?

BKGI is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPI is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKGI and 0.68% for MLPI.