PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKGI vs. BKAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKGI vs. BKAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKGI vs. BKAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
10.64%37.53%12.35%9.72%8.54%
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
0.16%7.23%1.17%5.67%3.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKGI achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than BKAG's 0.16% return.


BKGI

1D
0.20%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
10.64%
6M
15.16%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
10Y*

BKAG

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKGI vs. BKAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKGI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BKAG's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKGI vs. BKAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKGI
BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BKAG
BKAG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BKAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BKAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKAG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKGI vs. BKAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKGIBKAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

0.93

+1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.79

1.30

+1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.16

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

1.74

+1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.13

4.87

+11.26

BKGI vs. BKAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKGI Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the BKAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKGI and BKAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKGIBKAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

0.93

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

0.01

+1.66

Correlation

The correlation between BKGI and BKAG is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BKGI vs. BKAG - Dividend Comparison

BKGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than BKAG's 4.27% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
2.73%2.65%4.55%4.55%0.53%0.00%0.00%
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
4.27%4.17%4.26%3.33%2.49%1.55%1.16%

Drawdowns

BKGI vs. BKAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKGI drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum BKAG drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKGI and BKAG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKGIBKAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-18.53%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-2.51%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

-2.45%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-7.26%

+4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.90%

+1.15%

Volatility

BKGI vs. BKAG - Volatility Comparison

Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) at 1.72%. This indicates that BKGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKGIBKAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

1.72%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.90%

2.71%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

4.37%

+10.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

5.99%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.06%

5.59%

+8.47%