BKFI vs. USCI
BKFI (BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF) and USCI (United States Commodity Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BKFI is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while USCI is a Commodities fund tracking the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return. BKFI is actively managed, while USCI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. BKFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for USCI.
Performance
BKFI vs. USCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKFI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCI
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 22.70%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 19.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
BKFI vs. USCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | -0.26% |
USCI United States Commodity Index Fund | 22.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKFI and USCI is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKFI vs. USCI — Risk / Return Rank
BKFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USCI
BKFI vs. USCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKFI | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKFI vs. USCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum USCI drawdown of -66.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and USCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKFI | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -66.41% | +63.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -6.52% | +4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -29.37% | +28.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.51% | — |
Volatility
BKFI vs. USCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKFI | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 16.91% | -12.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 18.40% | -14.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 15.88% | -11.71% |
BKFI vs. USCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than USCI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKFI vs. USCI - Dividend Comparison
BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while USCI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | 2.15% |
USCI United States Commodity Index Fund | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKFI and USCI have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for USCI.
BKFI has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.00% for USCI.
BKFI is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while USCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and United States Commodity Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 1.03% for USCI.
Find the right allocation for BKFI and USCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer