BKFI vs. PSCE
BKFI (BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF) and PSCE (Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKFI is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while PSCE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index. BKFI is actively managed, while PSCE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. BKFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCE.
Performance
BKFI vs. PSCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKFI
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- YTD
- 32.36%
- 6M
- 31.96%
- 1Y
- 45.44%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- -2.41%
BKFI vs. PSCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | -0.04% |
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 25.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKFI and PSCE is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKFI vs. PSCE — Risk / Return Rank
BKFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCE
BKFI vs. PSCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKFI | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKFI vs. PSCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum PSCE drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and PSCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKFI | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -96.21% | +93.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -76.48% | +74.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -58.87% | +57.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.15% | — |
Volatility
BKFI vs. PSCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKFI | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.19% | 27.51% | -23.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.19% | 37.39% | -33.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.19% | 43.20% | -39.01% |
BKFI vs. PSCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKFI vs. PSCE - Dividend Comparison
BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than PSCE's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 2.28% | 2.39% | 1.70% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.22% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKFI and PSCE have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BKFI.
PSCE has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.76% for BKFI.
BKFI is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while PSCE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 0.29% for PSCE.
Find the right allocation for BKFI and PSCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer