BKFI vs. DDV
BKFI (BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
BKFI vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKFI
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDV
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKFI vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | -0.02% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKFI and DDV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKFI vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKFI | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 2.04 | -2.05 |
Drawdowns
BKFI vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKFI | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -1.92% | -1.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -0.14% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -0.35% | -0.85% |
Volatility
BKFI vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKFI | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13% | 2.67% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 2.67% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 2.67% | +1.46% |
BKFI vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKFI vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | 1.77% | 0.00% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKFI and DDV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BKFI.
BKFI has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for BKFI and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer