PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKFI vs. DDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKFI vs. DDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BKFI

1D
0.17%
1M
0.20%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DDV

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKFI vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BKFI and DDV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKFI vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BKFI vs. DDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKFIDDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

2.04

-2.05

Drawdowns

BKFI vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and DDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKFIDDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-1.92%

-1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-0.14%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-0.35%

-0.85%

Volatility

BKFI vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKFIDDVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

2.67%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.13%

2.67%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

2.67%

+1.46%

BKFI vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKFI vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison

BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BKFI
BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF
1.77%0.00%
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
1.21%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKFI and DDV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BKFI.

BKFI has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 0.25% for DDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKFI and DDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer