PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKF vs. ADVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKF vs. ADVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKF vs. ADVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BKF
iShares MSCI BRIC ETF
-7.17%22.30%9.24%1.25%
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
6.57%26.12%7.02%5.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKF achieves a -7.17% return, which is significantly lower than ADVE's 6.57% return.


BKF

1D
2.70%
1M
-6.83%
YTD
-7.17%
6M
-9.08%
1Y
3.52%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
-3.24%
10Y*
5.19%

ADVE

1D
3.40%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
6.57%
6M
10.65%
1Y
32.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKF vs. ADVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKF has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ADVE's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKF vs. ADVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKF
BKF Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKF Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKF Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ADVE
ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKF vs. ADVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKFADVEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

1.86

-1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.40

2.51

-2.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.38

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

2.75

-2.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.85

10.93

-10.09

BKF vs. ADVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKF Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the ADVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKF and ADVE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKFADVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.86

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

1.19

-1.19

Correlation

The correlation between BKF and ADVE is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BKF vs. ADVE - Dividend Comparison

BKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than ADVE's 2.80% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKF
iShares MSCI BRIC ETF
1.93%1.79%2.37%1.68%2.04%2.93%1.02%1.66%2.33%1.51%1.82%3.15%
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
2.80%2.97%6.00%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BKF vs. ADVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKF drawdown since its inception was -70.29%, which is greater than ADVE's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKF and ADVE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKFADVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.29%

-18.41%

-51.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-11.73%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.82%

-8.73%

-16.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.16%

-3.20%

-24.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

2.95%

+0.96%

Volatility

BKF vs. ADVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) is 7.23%, while Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) has a volatility of 8.77%. This indicates that BKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKFADVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

8.77%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

12.93%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

17.59%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

15.11%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.79%

15.11%

+6.68%