BKF vs. ADVE
BKF (iShares MSCI BRIC ETF) and ADVE (Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKF is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI BRIC Index, while ADVE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. BKF is passively managed, while ADVE is actively managed. Over the past year, BKF returned 2.20% vs 32.34% for ADVE. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BKF charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ADVE.
Performance
BKF vs. ADVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKF achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than ADVE's 17.57% return.
BKF
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- 6M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- 6.64%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.21%
ADVE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $67.14K | $41.11K | $33.36K | |
| $152.87K | $247.53K | $560.11K |
BKF vs. ADVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BKF iShares MSCI BRIC ETF | -5.54% | 22.30% | 9.24% | 3.05% |
ADVE Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF | 17.57% | 26.12% | 7.02% | 4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKF and ADVE is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between BKF and ADVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
BKF vs. ADVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKF
ADVE
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
BKF
ADVE
Consumer Cyclical
BKF
ADVE
Communication Services
BKF
ADVE
Technology
BKF
ADVE
Industrials
BKF
ADVE
Basic Materials
BKF
ADVE
Energy
BKF
ADVE
Healthcare
BKF
ADVE
Consumer Defensive
BKF
ADVE
Utilities
BKF
ADVE
Real Estate
BKF
ADVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKF vs. ADVE — Risk / Return Rank
BKF
ADVE
BKF vs. ADVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKF | ADVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.31 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 2.77 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 9.40 | -9.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKF vs. ADVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKF drawdown since its inception was -70.29%, which is greater than ADVE's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKF and ADVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKF | ADVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.29% | -18.41% | -51.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.45% | -11.73% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.50% | -3.85% | -19.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.09% | -3.24% | -24.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 3.45% | +3.86% |
Volatility
BKF vs. ADVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) is 3.78%, while Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that BKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKF | ADVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 6.54% | -2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.65% | 17.35% | -4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02% | 19.67% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 16.50% | +4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 16.50% | +5.18% |
BKF vs. ADVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKF has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ADVE's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKF vs. ADVE - Dividend Comparison
BKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than ADVE's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADVE Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF | 2.19% | 2.97% | 6.00% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKF iShares MSCI BRIC ETF | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.37% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.93% | 1.02% | 1.66% | 2.33% | 1.51% | 1.82% | 3.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKF and ADVE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADVE has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to BKF (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKF dropped -70.29% vs ADVE's -18.41%.
On 1-year performance, ADVE leads with 32.34% vs 2.20% for BKF. On fees, BKF is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BKF has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ADVE has performed better with a 32.34% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKF is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADVE.
ADVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.54% for BKF.
BKF is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ADVE is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BKF and 0.79% for ADVE.
ADVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKF and ADVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer