BKCH vs. XRPZ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both Blockchain funds - BKCH tracks the Solactive Blockchain Index while XRPZ tracks the CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BKCH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XRPZ.

Performance

BKCH vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than XRPZ's -41.03% return.

BKCH

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: -3.07%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 1Y: 23.59%
• 3Y*: 30.82%
• 5Y*: -5.83%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.79%

XRPZ

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.34%
• 6M: -33.18%
• YTD: -41.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	$2.64M	$3.41M	$7.65M
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	$2.25M	$2.57M	$3.39M

BKCH vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	6.75%	-1.26%
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	-41.03%	-11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCH and XRPZ is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

BKCH vs. XRPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKCH

BKCH Risk / Return Rank: 19
BKCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BKCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BKCH Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BKCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BKCH Martin Ratio Rank: 15

XRPZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKCH vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCH	XRPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.70	—	—

Drawdowns

BKCH vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than XRPZ's maximum drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and XRPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCH	XRPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.80%	-55.39%	-36.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.82%	-53.32%	+4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.52%	-35.33%	-26.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKCH	XRPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.14%	69.03%	+4.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.43%	69.03%	+6.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.58%	69.03%	+6.55%

BKCH vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCH vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison

BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while XRPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	1.79%	2.00%	7.61%	2.33%	1.29%	4.28%
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCH and XRPZ in my portfolio?

BKCH and XRPZ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKCH or XRPZ?

On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCH or XRPZ?

XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BKCH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCH or XRPZ?

BKCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for XRPZ.

What is the main difference between BKCH and XRPZ?

BKCH tracks Solactive Blockchain Index, while XRPZ tracks CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCH and 0.19% for XRPZ.