BKCH vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Global X. BKCH is actively managed, while KROP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKCH returned 58.43%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for KROP. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

BKCH vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a 36.44% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.59% return.

BKCH

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 36.44%
• 6M: 9.64%
• 1Y: 86.50%
• 3Y*: 58.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 0.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCH vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	36.44%	27.14%	18.81%	267.06%	-85.10%	-1.24%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.59%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCH and KROP is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021	0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between BKCH and KROP has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BKCH vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCH

BKCH Risk / Return Rank: 32
BKCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BKCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BKCH Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BKCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BKCH Martin Ratio Rank: 23

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 23
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCH vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKCH	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.81	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	1.24	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.15	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	1.14	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.86	2.58	+0.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKCH vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCH Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCH and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKCH	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	0.81	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	-0.57	+0.60

Drawdowns

BKCH vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than KROP's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCH	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.80%	-61.96%	-29.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.28%	-11.29%	-44.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.99%	-28.70%	-29.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.59%	-48.93%	+14.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.10%	-44.50%	-17.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.30%	4.99%	+25.31%

Volatility

BKCH vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.69%. This indicates that BKCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCH	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.28%	4.69%	+12.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.28%	11.98%	+39.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.80%	16.04%	+53.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.40%	22.27%	+53.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.40%	22.27%	+53.13%

BKCH vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BKCH and KROP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

BKCH vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than KROP's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	1.47%	2.00%	7.61%	2.33%	1.29%	4.28%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.34%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCH and KROP in my portfolio?

BKCH and KROP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKCH or KROP?

BKCH has higher volatility (17.28%) compared to KROP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCH dropped -91.80% vs KROP's -61.96%.

Which ETF is better, BKCH or KROP?

On 3-year performance, BKCH leads with 58.43% vs 0.72% for KROP. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKCH or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, BKCH has performed better with a 58.43% return vs 0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCH or KROP?

BKCH and KROP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCH or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.47% for BKCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.