BKCH vs. FTEC
BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. BKCH is actively managed, while FTEC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKCH returned 56.01%/yr vs 33.93%/yr for FTEC. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKCH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
BKCH vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a 38.46% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's 31.89% return.
BKCH
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 13.82%
- YTD
- 38.46%
- 6M
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 99.88%
- 3Y*
- 56.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 18.21%
- YTD
- 31.89%
- 6M
- 30.74%
- 1Y
- 60.87%
- 3Y*
- 33.93%
- 5Y*
- 22.49%
- 10Y*
- 25.57%
BKCH vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF | 38.46% | 27.14% | 18.81% | 267.06% | -85.10% | -1.24% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 31.89% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 12.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCH and FTEC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between BKCH and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCH vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
BKCH
FTEC
BKCH vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKCH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.48 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.76 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 12.10 | -8.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKCH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.97 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.99 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
BKCH vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -34.95% | -56.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.28% | -16.26% | -40.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.99% | -27.30% | -30.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.62% | -1.49% | -32.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.13% | -5.56% | -56.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.25% | 5.05% | +25.20% |
Volatility
BKCH vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) has a higher volatility of 18.09% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 6.43%. This indicates that BKCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.09% | 6.43% | +11.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.40% | 16.14% | +35.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.90% | 20.63% | +49.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.43% | 25.23% | +50.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.43% | 24.69% | +50.74% |
BKCH vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCH vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than FTEC's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF | 1.44% | 2.00% | 7.61% | 2.33% | 1.29% | 4.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.32% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCH and FTEC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKCH has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to FTEC (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCH dropped -91.80% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 3-year performance, BKCH leads with 56.01% vs 33.93% for FTEC. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BKCH has performed better with a 56.01% return vs 33.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BKCH.
BKCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCH and 0.08% for FTEC.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKCH and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer