BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO
BKCC.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF) and ZWB.TO (BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while ZWB.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, BKCC.TO returned 0.96%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for ZWB.TO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKCC.TO charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for ZWB.TO.
Performance
BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCC.TO achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly lower than ZWB.TO's 26.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BKCC.TO has underperformed ZWB.TO with an annualized return of 0.96%, while ZWB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.
BKCC.TO
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 21.38%
- 1Y
- 49.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.19%
- 5Y*
- -3.23%
- 10Y*
- 0.96%
ZWB.TO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 26.23%
- 6M
- 26.02%
- 1Y
- 61.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.29%
- 5Y*
- 15.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF | 21.49% | 28.05% | 17.14% | 5.41% | -58.55% | 24.57% | -5.90% | 16.56% | -17.08% | 7.78% |
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF | 26.23% | 34.91% | 19.41% | 6.67% | -11.00% | 30.81% | 1.68% | 14.32% | -8.08% | 11.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.
BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKCC.TO
ZWB.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BKCC.TO
ZWB.TO
Basic Materials
BKCC.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Communication Services
BKCC.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
BKCC.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
BKCC.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Energy
BKCC.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Healthcare
BKCC.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Industrials
BKCC.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Real Estate
BKCC.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Technology
BKCC.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Utilities
BKCC.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BKCC.TO
ZWB.TO
BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKCC.TO | ZWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.93 | 2.02 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.80 | 7.89 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.58 | 35.44 | -3.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.15%, which is greater than ZWB.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCC.TO | ZWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.15% | -39.36% | -39.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -7.82% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.16% | -14.05% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.15% | -25.26% | -53.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.15% | -39.36% | -39.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.14% | 0.00% | -24.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.20% | -5.54% | -12.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 1.74% | -0.17% |
Volatility
BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) is 2.74%, while BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that BKCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZWB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCC.TO | ZWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 3.38% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 9.95% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 11.51% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 168.09% | 12.65% | +155.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 124.24% | 15.67% | +108.57% |
BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCC.TO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than ZWB.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Dividend Comparison
BKCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.96%, more than ZWB.TO's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF | 8.96% | 10.43% | 12.30% | 10.93% | 8.24% | 2.76% | 2.96% | 2.72% | 3.13% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 3.68% |
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF | 4.62% | 5.38% | 6.66% | 7.62% | 7.30% | 5.46% | 5.80% | 5.53% | 5.59% | 4.80% | 5.04% | 5.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ZWB.TO is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZWB.TO is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for BKCC.TO.
BKCC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZWB.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for BKCC.TO and 0.72% for ZWB.TO.
Find the right allocation for BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer