PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCC.TO achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly lower than ZWB.TO's 26.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BKCC.TO has underperformed ZWB.TO with an annualized return of 0.96%, while ZWB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.


BKCC.TO

1D
0.36%
1M
5.58%
YTD
21.49%
6M
21.38%
1Y
49.37%
3Y*
25.19%
5Y*
-3.23%
10Y*
0.96%

ZWB.TO

1D
0.39%
1M
7.50%
YTD
26.23%
6M
26.02%
1Y
61.42%
3Y*
30.29%
5Y*
15.76%
10Y*
13.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKCC.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF
21.49%28.05%17.14%5.41%-58.55%24.57%-5.90%16.56%-17.08%7.78%
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
26.23%34.91%19.41%6.67%-11.00%30.81%1.68%14.32%-8.08%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012

0.64

Over the past year, BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.

BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKCC.TO
ZWB.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BKCC.TO
100.0%
ZWB.TO
100.0%

Basic Materials

BKCC.TO

-

ZWB.TO

-

Communication Services

BKCC.TO

-

ZWB.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

BKCC.TO

-

ZWB.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

BKCC.TO

-

ZWB.TO

-

Energy

BKCC.TO

-

ZWB.TO

-

Healthcare

BKCC.TO

-

ZWB.TO

-

Industrials

BKCC.TO

-

ZWB.TO

-

Real Estate

BKCC.TO

-

ZWB.TO

-

Technology

BKCC.TO

-

ZWB.TO

-

Utilities

BKCC.TO

-

ZWB.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCC.TO
BKCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BKCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ZWB.TO
ZWB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKCC.TOZWB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.93

2.02

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.80

7.89

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.58

35.44

-3.86

BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.77, which is comparable to the ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.15%, which is greater than ZWB.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKCC.TOZWB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.15%

-39.36%

-39.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-7.82%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.16%

-14.05%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.15%

-25.26%

-53.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.15%

-39.36%

-39.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.14%

0.00%

-24.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-5.54%

-12.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.74%

-0.17%

Volatility

BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) is 2.74%, while BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that BKCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZWB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKCC.TOZWB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

3.38%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

9.95%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

11.51%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.09%

12.65%

+155.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

124.24%

15.67%

+108.57%

BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCC.TO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than ZWB.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKCC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Dividend Comparison

BKCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.96%, more than ZWB.TO's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKCC.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF
8.96%10.43%12.30%10.93%8.24%2.76%2.96%2.72%3.13%2.89%2.89%3.68%
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
4.62%5.38%6.66%7.62%7.30%5.46%5.80%5.53%5.59%4.80%5.04%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZWB.TO is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZWB.TO is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for BKCC.TO.

BKCC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZWB.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for BKCC.TO and 0.72% for ZWB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKCC.TO and ZWB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer