BKCC.TO vs. RCDC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BKCC.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF) and RCDC.TO (RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKCC.TO returned 22.19%/yr vs 18.86%/yr for RCDC.TO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKCC.TO charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for RCDC.TO.

Performance

BKCC.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) and RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCC.TO achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than RCDC.TO's 12.49% return.

BKCC.TO

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 18.13%
• 1Y: 41.73%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: 9.35%

RCDC.TO

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: 12.49%
• 6M: 14.54%
• 1Y: 29.08%
• 3Y*: 18.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCC.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF	14.24%	28.05%	17.14%	0.33%
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF	12.49%	19.29%	17.27%	2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCC.TO and RCDC.TO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2023	0.52

Over the past year, BKCC.TO and RCDC.TO have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BKCC.TO vs. RCDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCC.TO

BKCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
BKCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BKCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BKCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BKCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BKCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

RCDC.TO

RCDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
RCDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RCDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
RCDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
RCDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RCDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCC.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) and RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKCC.TO	RCDC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.06	3.54	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.85	5.12	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.80	1.67	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.75	5.38	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.70	26.80	-0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKCC.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.06, which is comparable to the RCDC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCC.TO and RCDC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKCC.TO	RCDC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.06	3.54	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	1.50	-1.50

Drawdowns

BKCC.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.18%, which is greater than RCDC.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCC.TO and RCDC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCC.TO	RCDC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.18%	-10.88%	-30.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.30%	-5.43%	-1.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.16%	-10.88%	-2.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-0.19%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.91%	-1.87%	-4.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.09%	+0.48%

Volatility

BKCC.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) at 2.49%. This indicates that BKCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCC.TO	RCDC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	2.49%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.18%	6.71%	+2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.31%	8.25%	+2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.99%	10.15%	+2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	10.15%	+6.84%

BKCC.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCC.TO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than RCDC.TO's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCC.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Dividend Comparison

BKCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%, more than RCDC.TO's 6.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF	9.52%	10.43%	12.30%	10.93%	8.23%	5.52%	5.92%	5.44%	6.24%	5.76%	5.79%	7.35%
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF	6.33%	6.38%	6.46%	6.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCC.TO and RCDC.TO in my portfolio?

BKCC.TO and RCDC.TO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKCC.TO or RCDC.TO?

On fees, RCDC.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCC.TO or RCDC.TO?

RCDC.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for BKCC.TO.

What is the main difference between BKCC.TO and RCDC.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and RBC. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for BKCC.TO and 0.64% for RCDC.TO.