PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKAG vs. BKSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKAG vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKAG achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than BKSE's 14.30% return.


BKAG

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.12%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*

BKSE

1D
0.34%
1M
3.07%
YTD
14.30%
6M
15.09%
1Y
36.43%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKAG vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
0.29%7.23%1.17%5.67%-13.29%-1.46%2.15%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
14.30%13.09%9.56%22.37%-18.44%16.18%58.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BKAG and BKSE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.13

The correlation between BKAG and BKSE shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKAG vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKAG
BKAG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BKAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BKAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKAG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKAG vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKAGBKSEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

2.08

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

2.98

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.84

-1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.49

13.40

-7.90

BKAG vs. BKSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the BKSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKAG and BKSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKAGBKSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.08

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.34

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.74

-0.73

Drawdowns

BKAG vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKAG drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum BKSE drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKAG and BKSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKAGBKSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-29.08%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-9.40%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.04%

-26.76%

+20.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-29.08%

+11.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

0.00%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-9.06%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.69%

-1.76%

Volatility

BKAG vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) is 1.22%, while BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that BKAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKAGBKSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

4.36%

-3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

11.92%

-9.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

17.59%

-13.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

21.43%

-15.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.55%

22.30%

-16.75%

BKAG vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKAG has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BKSE's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKAG vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison

BKAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than BKSE's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
4.24%4.17%4.26%3.33%2.49%1.55%1.16%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKAG and BKSE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKSE has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to BKAG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKAG dropped -18.53% vs BKSE's -29.08%.

On 5-year performance, BKSE leads with 7.21% vs 0.07% for BKAG. On fees, BKAG is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, BKAG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKSE has performed better with a 7.21% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKAG is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for BKSE.

BKAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 1.15% for BKSE.

BKAG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while BKSE is Small Cap Growth Equities. BKAG tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Total Return Index, while BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BKAG and 0.04% for BKSE.

BKSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKAG and BKSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer