PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BJBHX vs. FQTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BJBHX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Global High Income Fund (BJBHX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BJBHX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BJBHX
abrdn Global High Income Fund
-0.98%6.99%7.69%12.32%-12.63%2.98%5.32%7.63%
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
0.52%7.51%8.03%13.44%-14.39%8.51%3.68%4.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJBHX achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 0.52% return.


BJBHX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
-0.38%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
4.52%

FQTIX

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
0.52%
6M
2.66%
1Y
9.72%
3Y*
7.86%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BJBHX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJBHX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BJBHX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJBHX
BJBHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BJBHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJBHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJBHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BJBHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJBHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FQTIX
FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJBHX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global High Income Fund (BJBHX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BJBHXFQTIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.55

-1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

3.46

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.61

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

3.85

-2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.27

17.15

-11.88

BJBHX vs. FQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJBHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the FQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJBHX and FQTIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BJBHXFQTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.55

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.61

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.55

+0.78

Correlation

The correlation between BJBHX and FQTIX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BJBHX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison

BJBHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, less than FQTIX's 7.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BJBHX
abrdn Global High Income Fund
6.41%6.36%6.08%5.02%7.45%4.60%4.35%5.37%5.62%3.69%4.97%6.16%
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
7.03%5.70%7.86%7.64%8.10%7.15%6.89%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BJBHX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJBHX drawdown since its inception was -28.45%, which is greater than FQTIX's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJBHX and FQTIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BJBHXFQTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.45%

-24.62%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-2.41%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.77%

-18.81%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-1.95%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-4.42%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.54%

+0.37%

Volatility

BJBHX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Global High Income Fund (BJBHX) is 1.31%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that BJBHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BJBHXFQTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

1.57%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.03%

2.38%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

3.85%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.33%

5.92%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.07%

7.80%

-2.73%