BJAN vs. FMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR).
BJAN and FMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BJAN is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 31, 2018. FMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021.
Performance
BJAN vs. FMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BJAN vs. FMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | -2.35% | 14.81% | 17.36% | 23.66% | -11.40% | 9.84% |
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 2.73% | 9.69% | 14.61% | 20.39% | -5.51% | 11.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BJAN achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than FMAR's 2.73% return.
BJAN
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
FMAR
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BJAN vs. FMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BJAN vs. FMAR — Risk / Return Rank
BJAN
FMAR
BJAN vs. FMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BJAN | FMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.39 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 2.03 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.87 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 11.91 | -3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BJAN | FMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.39 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.96 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.99 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between BJAN and FMAR is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BJAN vs. FMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BJAN nor FMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.66% |
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BJAN vs. FMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BJAN drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, which is greater than FMAR's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJAN and FMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BJAN | FMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -14.36% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -8.31% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.38% | -14.36% | -3.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | 0.00% | -3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.97% | -2.21% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.30% | +0.51% |
Volatility
BJAN vs. FMAR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) at 2.94%. This indicates that BJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BJAN | FMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 2.94% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.23% | 3.79% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.97% | 11.05% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.00% | 10.49% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 10.47% | +3.72% |