BJAN vs. FBUF
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF).
BJAN and FBUF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BJAN is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 31, 2018. FBUF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 9, 2024.
Performance
BJAN vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BJAN vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | -2.35% | 14.81% | 10.54% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | -2.14% | 14.01% | 10.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BJAN achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's -2.14% return.
BJAN
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
FBUF
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 14.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BJAN vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BJAN vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank
BJAN
FBUF
BJAN vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BJAN | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 1.87 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.13 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 9.09 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BJAN | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.12 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between BJAN and FBUF is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BJAN vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison
BJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.66% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 0.67% | 0.64% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BJAN vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BJAN drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJAN and FBUF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BJAN | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -11.09% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -6.81% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -3.96% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.97% | -1.43% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.60% | +0.21% |
Volatility
BJAN vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) at 3.08%. This indicates that BJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BJAN | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 3.08% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.23% | 6.52% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.97% | 10.76% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.00% | 9.86% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 9.86% | +4.33% |