BJAN vs. BUFF
BJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BJAN tracks the S&P 500 while BUFF tracks the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BJAN returned 10.74%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for BUFF. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
BJAN vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BJAN achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.58% return.
BJAN
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- —
BJAN vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 7.20% | 14.81% | 17.36% | 23.66% | -11.40% | 13.86% | 12.54% | 20.73% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.58% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -12.08% | 33.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BJAN and BUFF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between BJAN and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
BJAN vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BJAN
BUFF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BJAN
BUFF
Financial Services
BJAN
BUFF
Communication Services
BJAN
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
BJAN
BUFF
Healthcare
BJAN
BUFF
Industrials
BJAN
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
BJAN
BUFF
Energy
BJAN
BUFF
Utilities
BJAN
BUFF
Real Estate
BJAN
BUFF
Basic Materials
BJAN
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BJAN vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
BJAN
BUFF
BJAN vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.60 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 4.11 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.89 | 21.95 | -5.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.86 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 1.04 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.49 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
BJAN vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BJAN drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJAN and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -46.23% | +19.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -3.58% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.81% | -10.24% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.38% | -10.24% | -7.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.11% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -6.18% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 0.67% | +0.57% |
Volatility
BJAN vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.01%. This indicates that BJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | 1.01% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.06% | 3.83% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.70% | 5.15% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 8.41% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 17.67% | -3.61% |
BJAN vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
BJAN vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither BJAN nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BJAN and BUFF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BJAN has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to BUFF (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJAN dropped -26.86% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, BJAN leads with 10.74% vs 8.75% for BUFF. On fees, BJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BJAN has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
BJAN and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BJAN tracks S&P 500, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BJAN and 0.89% for BUFF.
BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BJAN and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer