BIVIX vs. WRAIX
BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) and WRAIX (Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, BIVIX returned 8.80%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for WRAIX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIVIX charges 3.17%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for WRAIX.
Performance
BIVIX vs. WRAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIVIX achieves a -22.03% return, which is significantly lower than WRAIX's 2.85% return.
BIVIX
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -11.08%
- YTD
- -22.03%
- 6M
- -19.30%
- 1Y
- -15.80%
- 3Y*
- -7.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- —
WRAIX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 6.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.43%
BIVIX vs. WRAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | -22.03% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund | 2.85% | 9.13% | 7.74% | 7.73% | -3.41% | 6.52% | 1.04% | 12.34% | -2.67% | 3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIVIX and WRAIX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.05 |
The correlation between BIVIX and WRAIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIVIX vs. WRAIX — Risk / Return Rank
BIVIX
WRAIX
BIVIX vs. WRAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIVIX | WRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.24 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 1.48 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 6.19 | -7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIVIX vs. WRAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIVIX drawdown since its inception was -26.95%, which is greater than WRAIX's maximum drawdown of -15.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVIX and WRAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIVIX | WRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.95% | -15.44% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.95% | -5.03% | -21.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.95% | -5.03% | -21.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.95% | -9.24% | -17.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.95% | -0.87% | -26.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -1.97% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.01% | 1.20% | +7.81% |
Volatility
BIVIX vs. WRAIX - Volatility Comparison
Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) at 2.05%. This indicates that BIVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIVIX | WRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.50% | 2.05% | +10.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.10% | 5.05% | +17.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.30% | 6.17% | +20.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 6.52% | +10.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 6.75% | +10.65% |
BIVIX vs. WRAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIVIX has a 3.17% expense ratio, which is higher than WRAIX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIVIX vs. WRAIX - Dividend Comparison
BIVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than WRAIX's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.82% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund | 0.17% | 0.17% | 1.47% | 1.31% | 2.77% | 0.52% | 1.98% | 1.15% | 1.25% | 1.15% | 0.30% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIVIX and WRAIX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVIX has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to WRAIX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIVIX dropped -26.95% vs WRAIX's -15.44%.
WRAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIVIX and WRAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer