BIVIX vs. SAOAX
BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) and SAOAX (Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, BIVIX returned 13.32%/yr vs 5.94%/yr for SAOAX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIVIX charges 3.17%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for SAOAX.
Performance
BIVIX vs. SAOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIVIX achieves a -6.05% return, which is significantly lower than SAOAX's 15.47% return.
BIVIX
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 7.92%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -6.05%
- 1Y
- -2.49%
- 3Y*
- -1.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- —
SAOAX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- YTD
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 17.05%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 3.69%
BIVIX vs. SAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | -6.05% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
SAOAX Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund | 15.47% | -2.00% | 10.49% | 8.81% | -8.66% | 14.38% | 0.17% | -2.26% | -11.25% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIVIX and SAOAX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.26 |
The correlation between BIVIX and SAOAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIVIX vs. SAOAX — Risk / Return Rank
BIVIX
SAOAX
BIVIX vs. SAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIVIX | SAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.31 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 2.73 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 9.73 | -10.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIVIX vs. SAOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIVIX drawdown since its inception was -26.95%, smaller than the maximum SAOAX drawdown of -52.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVIX and SAOAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIVIX | SAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.95% | -52.28% | +25.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.95% | -5.90% | -21.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.95% | -35.90% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.95% | -35.90% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.96% | -2.50% | -9.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -8.68% | +2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.85% | 1.68% | +8.17% |
Volatility
BIVIX vs. SAOAX - Volatility Comparison
Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a higher volatility of 17.20% compared to Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) at 3.94%. This indicates that BIVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIVIX | SAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.20% | 3.94% | +13.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.03% | 7.34% | +18.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.79% | 9.31% | +20.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 28.75% | -10.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 21.18% | -3.16% |
BIVIX vs. SAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIVIX has a 3.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SAOAX's 1.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIVIX vs. SAOAX - Dividend Comparison
BIVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than SAOAX's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.34% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% | 0.00% |
SAOAX Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund | 0.62% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 0.62% | 0.72% | 0.82% | 1.22% | 0.92% | 1.17% | 7.07% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIVIX and SAOAX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVIX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to SAOAX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIVIX dropped -26.95% vs SAOAX's -52.28%.
SAOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIVIX and SAOAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer