BIVIX vs. MNWIX
BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) and MNWIX (MFS Managed Wealth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, BIVIX returned 9.18%/yr vs 4.04%/yr for MNWIX. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. BIVIX charges 3.17%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for MNWIX.
Performance
BIVIX vs. MNWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIVIX achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly lower than MNWIX's 1.35% return.
BIVIX
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -13.33%
- 6M
- -9.90%
- 1Y
- -7.34%
- 3Y*
- -4.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- —
MNWIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.88%
BIVIX vs. MNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | -13.33% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
MNWIX MFS Managed Wealth Fund | 1.35% | 7.71% | 6.42% | 5.41% | -2.15% | 1.35% | 3.11% | 8.70% | 2.10% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIVIX and MNWIX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2017 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIVIX vs. MNWIX — Risk / Return Rank
BIVIX
MNWIX
BIVIX vs. MNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIVIX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.13 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 0.72 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 2.88 | -3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIVIX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 0.72 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 1.02 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.87 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
BIVIX vs. MNWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIVIX drawdown since its inception was -20.70%, which is greater than MNWIX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVIX and MNWIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIVIX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.70% | -5.57% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.70% | -5.57% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | -5.57% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.70% | -5.57% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.79% | -0.15% | -18.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -1.13% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 1.39% | +6.41% |
Volatility
BIVIX vs. MNWIX - Volatility Comparison
Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) at 1.39%. This indicates that BIVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIVIX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.08% | 1.39% | +10.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 4.40% | +15.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.20% | 5.54% | +18.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 3.97% | +12.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 3.84% | +13.25% |
BIVIX vs. MNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIVIX has a 3.17% expense ratio, which is higher than MNWIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIVIX vs. MNWIX - Dividend Comparison
BIVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than MNWIX's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.53% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MNWIX MFS Managed Wealth Fund | 0.75% | 0.76% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.70% | 0.13% | 0.24% | 0.54% | 0.42% | 0.94% | 2.65% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIVIX and MNWIX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVIX has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to MNWIX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIVIX dropped -20.70% vs MNWIX's -5.57%.
MNWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIVIX and MNWIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer