BIVIX vs. HSGFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) and HSGFX (Hussman Strategic Growth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, BIVIX returned 9.18%/yr vs -3.66%/yr for HSGFX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIVIX charges 3.17%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for HSGFX.

Performance

BIVIX vs. HSGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIVIX achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly lower than HSGFX's -9.84% return.

BIVIX

• 1D: -4.48%
• 1M: -7.81%
• YTD: -13.33%
• 6M: -9.90%
• 1Y: -7.34%
• 3Y*: -4.36%
• 5Y*: 9.18%
• 10Y*: —

HSGFX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -4.47%
• YTD: -9.84%
• 6M: -9.50%
• 1Y: -18.99%
• 3Y*: -4.49%
• 5Y*: -3.66%
• 10Y*: -2.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIVIX vs. HSGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class	-13.33%	4.63%	-8.81%	16.80%	50.01%	63.81%	11.46%	11.59%	3.68%	8.93%
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	-9.84%	6.24%	-6.99%	-11.60%	17.33%	-0.23%	14.52%	-18.87%	8.78%	-5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BIVIX and HSGFX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2017	0.17

Over the past year, BIVIX and HSGFX have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BIVIX vs. HSGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIVIX

BIVIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
BIVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BIVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BIVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BIVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BIVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

HSGFX

HSGFX Risk / Return Rank: 0
HSGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIVIX vs. HSGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIVIX	HSGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	-1.77	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	-2.60	+2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.73	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	-0.99	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.81	-1.93	+1.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIVIX vs. HSGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIVIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is higher than the HSGFX Sharpe Ratio of -1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIVIX and HSGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIVIX	HSGFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	-1.77	+1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	-0.33	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.00	+0.84

Drawdowns

BIVIX vs. HSGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIVIX drawdown since its inception was -20.70%, smaller than the maximum HSGFX drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVIX and HSGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIVIX	HSGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.70%	-60.61%	+39.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.70%	-19.80%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.70%	-24.22%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.70%	-24.22%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.79%	-57.05%	+38.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-26.86%	+20.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.80%	10.29%	-2.49%

Volatility

BIVIX vs. HSGFX - Volatility Comparison

Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) at 3.89%. This indicates that BIVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIVIX	HSGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.08%	3.89%	+8.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.18%	8.72%	+11.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.20%	11.14%	+13.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	11.06%	+5.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.09%	10.70%	+6.39%

BIVIX vs. HSGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIVIX has a 3.17% expense ratio, which is higher than HSGFX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIVIX vs. HSGFX - Dividend Comparison

BIVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than HSGFX's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class	2.53%	2.20%	3.95%	20.15%	27.91%	16.08%	3.15%	3.19%	4.79%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	2.58%	2.33%	3.00%	3.10%	1.08%	0.42%	0.16%	1.84%	1.19%	0.50%	0.28%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIVIX and HSGFX in my portfolio?

BIVIX and HSGFX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIVIX or HSGFX?

BIVIX has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to HSGFX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIVIX dropped -20.70% vs HSGFX's -60.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.