BIVIX vs. FLSPX
BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) and FLSPX (Meeder Spectrum Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, BIVIX returned 8.80%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for FLSPX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. BIVIX charges 3.17%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for FLSPX.
Performance
BIVIX vs. FLSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIVIX achieves a -22.03% return, which is significantly lower than FLSPX's 10.75% return.
BIVIX
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -11.08%
- YTD
- -22.03%
- 6M
- -19.30%
- 1Y
- -15.80%
- 3Y*
- -7.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FLSPX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
BIVIX vs. FLSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | -22.03% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
FLSPX Meeder Spectrum Fund | 10.75% | 16.15% | 27.96% | 14.00% | -11.49% | 20.56% | -0.23% | 13.03% | -3.96% | 11.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIVIX and FLSPX is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | -0.01 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BIVIX and FLSPX has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIVIX vs. FLSPX — Risk / Return Rank
BIVIX
FLSPX
BIVIX vs. FLSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIVIX | FLSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.40 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 3.23 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 13.61 | -15.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIVIX vs. FLSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIVIX drawdown since its inception was -26.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FLSPX drawdown of -27.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVIX and FLSPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIVIX | FLSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.95% | -27.07% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.95% | -8.73% | -18.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.95% | -16.23% | -10.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.95% | -20.01% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.95% | -0.95% | -26.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -5.67% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.01% | 2.07% | +6.94% |
Volatility
BIVIX vs. FLSPX - Volatility Comparison
Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) at 4.73%. This indicates that BIVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIVIX | FLSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.50% | 4.73% | +7.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.10% | 9.90% | +12.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.30% | 12.63% | +13.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 13.47% | +3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 13.69% | +3.71% |
BIVIX vs. FLSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIVIX has a 3.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSPX's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIVIX vs. FLSPX - Dividend Comparison
BIVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than FLSPX's 4.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.82% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLSPX Meeder Spectrum Fund | 4.09% | 4.32% | 17.39% | 8.41% | 2.81% | 5.55% | 0.09% | 0.96% | 1.26% | 6.78% | 2.52% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIVIX and FLSPX have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVIX has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to FLSPX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIVIX dropped -26.95% vs FLSPX's -27.07%.
FLSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIVIX and FLSPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer