PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIV vs. RIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIV vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIV achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 35.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BIV has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 1.89%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.54% annualized return.


BIV

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.18%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.31%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
1.89%

RIO

1D
1.65%
1M
-5.97%
YTD
35.32%
6M
43.14%
1Y
89.03%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
22.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIV vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.06%8.52%1.57%6.07%-13.21%-2.40%9.67%10.34%-0.19%3.65%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
35.32%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BIV and RIO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

-0.14

The correlation between BIV and RIO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIV vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIV vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIVRIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

5.89

-4.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.90

21.91

-18.01

BIV vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIV and RIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIV vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIV drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIV and RIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIVRIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-88.97%

+70.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-15.19%

+12.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

-24.19%

+18.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.74%

-35.25%

+16.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.95%

-37.47%

+18.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-5.97%

+4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-23.76%

+20.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

4.09%

-2.99%

Volatility

BIV vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) is 1.45%, while Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that BIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIVRIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

11.81%

-10.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

24.27%

-21.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.03%

29.32%

-25.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

29.30%

-22.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.51%

30.65%

-25.14%

Dividends

BIV vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

BIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than RIO's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.21%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.82%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIV and RIO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIO has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to BIV (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIV dropped -18.95% vs RIO's -88.97%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIV and RIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer