PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIV vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIV vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIV achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.88% return.


BIV

1D
0.10%
1M
0.53%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
0.01%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
1.83%

IBIT

1D
-3.26%
1M
-17.81%
YTD
-28.88%
6M
-28.88%
1Y
-39.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIV vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.13%8.52%2.45%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-28.88%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BIV and IBIT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIV vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIV vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIVIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.86

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

-0.77

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

-1.30

+4.68

BIV vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIV and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIV vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIV drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIV and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIVIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-52.11%

+33.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-52.11%

+48.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-50.47%

+48.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-16.85%

+13.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

30.58%

-29.44%

Volatility

BIV vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) is 1.23%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that BIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIVIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

13.18%

-11.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

34.64%

-31.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

44.31%

-40.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

50.22%

-43.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.50%

50.22%

-44.72%

BIV vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BIV vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

BIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.21%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIV and IBIT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to BIV (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIV dropped -18.95% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

On 1-year performance, BIV leads with 3.84% vs -39.82% for IBIT. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BIV has performed better with a 3.84% return vs -39.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

BIV is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. BIV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BIV and 0.25% for IBIT.

BIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIV and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer