BIV vs. FBND
BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. BIV is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIV returned 1.83%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for FBND. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BIV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
BIV vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIV achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, BIV has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 1.83%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.47% annualized return.
BIV
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
FBND
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
BIV vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | -0.67% | 8.52% | 1.57% | 6.07% | -13.21% | -2.40% | 9.67% | 10.34% | -0.19% | 3.65% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.10% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIV and FBND is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014 | 0.85 |
The correlation between BIV and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIV vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
BIV
FBND
BIV vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIV | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 2.01 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 5.97 | -1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIV | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.41 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.12 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.41 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.44 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
BIV vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIV drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIV and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIV | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -17.25% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -2.66% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.07% | -5.94% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.74% | -17.25% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.95% | -17.25% | -1.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -1.82% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -3.35% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 0.90% | +0.17% |
Volatility
BIV vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.23%. This indicates that BIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIV | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 1.23% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 2.75% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 3.80% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 5.92% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 6.10% | -0.59% |
BIV vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIV vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
BIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.24% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BIV and FBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BIV has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIV dropped -18.95% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 10-year performance, FBND leads with 2.47% vs 1.83% for BIV. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FBND has performed better with a 2.47% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.24% for BIV.
BIV is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BIV and 0.36% for FBND.
FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIV and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer