PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITY vs. USNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITY vs. USNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -23.09% return, which is significantly lower than USNG's 31.42% return.


BITY

1D
-2.61%
1M
-19.63%
YTD
-23.09%
6M
-26.69%
1Y
-37.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USNG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
31.42%
6M
28.41%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITY vs. USNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BITY and USNG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITY vs. USNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITY
BITY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

USNG
USNG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITY vs. USNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITYUSNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.41

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

5.97

-6.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

19.70

-21.11

BITY vs. USNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITY Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the USNG Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITY and USNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITYUSNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

2.47

-3.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.70

2.66

-3.36

Drawdowns

BITY vs. USNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -46.36%, which is greater than USNG's maximum drawdown of -6.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and USNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITYUSNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.36%

-6.82%

-39.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.36%

-6.82%

-39.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.49%

-4.10%

-41.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.67%

-1.40%

-18.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.48%

2.07%

+24.41%

Volatility

BITY vs. USNG - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) at 6.40%. This indicates that BITY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITYUSNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

6.40%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.24%

12.56%

+18.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.94%

16.52%

+23.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.02%

16.55%

+22.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.02%

16.55%

+22.47%

BITY vs. USNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than USNG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITY vs. USNG - Dividend Comparison

BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.66%, more than USNG's 1.13% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BITY and USNG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITY has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to USNG (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -46.36% vs USNG's -6.82%.

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 40.50% vs -37.35% for BITY. On fees, USNG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, USNG has been the lower-risk option at 6.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 40.50% return vs -37.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USNG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.66%, compared with 1.13% for USNG.

BITY is categorized as Derivative Income, while USNG is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.59% for USNG.

USNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITY and USNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer