BITY vs. USNG
BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while USNG is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BITY returned -37.35% vs 40.50% for USNG. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for USNG.
Performance
BITY vs. USNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -23.09% return, which is significantly lower than USNG's 31.42% return.
BITY
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -19.63%
- YTD
- -23.09%
- 6M
- -26.69%
- 1Y
- -37.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USNG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- 31.42%
- 6M
- 28.41%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITY vs. USNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | -23.09% | -18.43% |
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF | 31.42% | 10.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITY and USNG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITY vs. USNG — Risk / Return Rank
BITY
USNG
BITY vs. USNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITY | USNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.41 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 5.97 | -6.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 19.70 | -21.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITY | USNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.94 | 2.47 | -3.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.70 | 2.66 | -3.36 |
Drawdowns
BITY vs. USNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -46.36%, which is greater than USNG's maximum drawdown of -6.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and USNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITY | USNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.36% | -6.82% | -39.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.36% | -6.82% | -39.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.49% | -4.10% | -41.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -1.40% | -18.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.48% | 2.07% | +24.41% |
Volatility
BITY vs. USNG - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) at 6.40%. This indicates that BITY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITY | USNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | 6.40% | +3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.24% | 12.56% | +18.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.94% | 16.52% | +23.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 16.55% | +22.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 16.55% | +22.47% |
BITY vs. USNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than USNG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITY vs. USNG - Dividend Comparison
BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.66%, more than USNG's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | 39.66% | 21.53% |
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF | 1.13% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITY and USNG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITY has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to USNG (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -46.36% vs USNG's -6.82%.
On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 40.50% vs -37.35% for BITY. On fees, USNG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, USNG has been the lower-risk option at 6.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 40.50% return vs -37.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USNG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.
BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.66%, compared with 1.13% for USNG.
BITY is categorized as Derivative Income, while USNG is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.59% for USNG.
USNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITY and USNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer