BITY vs. SWAN
BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while SWAN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index. BITY is actively managed, while SWAN is passively managed. Over the past year, BITY returned -37.35% vs 17.67% for SWAN. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SWAN.
Performance
BITY vs. SWAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -23.09% return, which is significantly lower than SWAN's 5.21% return.
BITY
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -19.63%
- YTD
- -23.09%
- 6M
- -26.69%
- 1Y
- -37.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWAN
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- —
BITY vs. SWAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | -23.09% | -8.21% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 5.21% | 15.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITY and SWAN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITY vs. SWAN — Risk / Return Rank
BITY
SWAN
BITY vs. SWAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITY | SWAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.34 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 2.52 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 9.93 | -11.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITY | SWAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.94 | 1.89 | -2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.70 | 0.58 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
BITY vs. SWAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -46.36%, which is greater than SWAN's maximum drawdown of -31.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and SWAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITY | SWAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.36% | -31.04% | -15.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.36% | -7.05% | -39.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.49% | -0.61% | -44.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -8.88% | -10.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.48% | 1.78% | +24.70% |
Volatility
BITY vs. SWAN - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) at 3.48%. This indicates that BITY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITY | SWAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | 3.48% | +6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.24% | 7.28% | +23.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.94% | 9.39% | +30.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 11.33% | +27.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 12.47% | +26.55% |
BITY vs. SWAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SWAN's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITY vs. SWAN - Dividend Comparison
BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.66%, more than SWAN's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | 39.66% | 21.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 2.79% | 2.86% | 2.54% | 2.98% | 2.12% | 5.04% | 1.64% | 3.69% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITY and SWAN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITY has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to SWAN (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -46.36% vs SWAN's -31.04%.
On 1-year performance, SWAN leads with 17.67% vs -37.35% for BITY. On fees, SWAN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SWAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SWAN has performed better with a 17.67% return vs -37.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SWAN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.
BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.66%, compared with 2.79% for SWAN.
BITY is categorized as Derivative Income, while SWAN is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.49% for SWAN.
SWAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITY and SWAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer