BITY vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BITY returned -37.35% vs 5.69% for LQTI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

BITY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -23.09% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.16% return.

BITY

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: -19.63%
• YTD: -23.09%
• 6M: -26.69%
• 1Y: -37.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-23.09%	-8.21%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.16%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BITY and LQTI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

BITY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.94	1.12	-2.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.30	1.64	-2.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.19	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	1.68	-2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	5.15	-6.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITY vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITY Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITY and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.94	1.12	-2.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.70	0.88	-1.58

Drawdowns

BITY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -46.36%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.36%	-3.41%	-42.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.36%	-3.41%	-42.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.49%	-1.44%	-44.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.67%	-0.88%	-18.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.48%	1.11%	+25.37%

Volatility

BITY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.65%. This indicates that BITY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.68%	1.65%	+8.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.24%	4.02%	+27.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.94%	5.10%	+34.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.02%	5.97%	+33.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.02%	5.97%	+33.05%

BITY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BITY and LQTI have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

BITY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.66%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	39.66%	21.53%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.11%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITY and LQTI in my portfolio?

BITY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITY or LQTI?

BITY has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to LQTI (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -46.36% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, BITY or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, LQTI leads with 5.69% vs -37.35% for BITY. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITY or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, LQTI has performed better with a 5.69% return vs -37.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITY or LQTI?

BITY and LQTI have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITY or LQTI?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.66%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between BITY and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and FT Vest.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.