BITX vs. EZBC
BITX (2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BITX tracks the S&P CME Bitcoin Futures Daily Roll Index (200%) while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BITX returned -73.21% vs -38.68% for EZBC. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BITX charges 2.38%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
BITX vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITX achieves a -52.31% return, which is significantly lower than EZBC's -25.36% return.
BITX
- 1D
- -5.39%
- 1M
- -34.65%
- YTD
- -52.31%
- 6M
- -58.66%
- 1Y
- -73.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -18.42%
- YTD
- -25.36%
- 6M
- -29.82%
- 1Y
- -38.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITX vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITX 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -52.31% | -38.71% | 124.88% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -25.36% | -6.56% | 100.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITX and EZBC is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between BITX and EZBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITX vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
BITX
EZBC
BITX vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITX | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.86 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.79 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | -1.36 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITX | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | -0.89 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.30 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
BITX vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITX drawdown since its inception was -78.92%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITX and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITX | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.92% | -49.37% | -29.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.92% | -49.37% | -29.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.92% | -48.04% | -30.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -16.01% | -15.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.03% | 28.42% | +21.61% |
Volatility
BITX vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) has a higher volatility of 19.24% compared to Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) at 9.43%. This indicates that BITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITX | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.24% | 9.43% | +9.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.07% | 34.44% | +34.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.83% | 43.67% | +43.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 98.27% | 50.06% | +48.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 98.27% | 50.06% | +48.21% |
BITX vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITX has a 2.38% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITX vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
BITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.24%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BITX 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 33.24% | 21.69% | 10.70% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, BITX and EZBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BITX has higher volatility (19.24%) compared to EZBC (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITX dropped -78.92% vs EZBC's -49.37%.
On 1-year performance, EZBC leads with -38.68% vs -73.21% for BITX. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZBC has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EZBC has performed better with a -38.68% return vs -73.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.38% for BITX.
BITX has the higher dividend yield at 33.24%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.
BITX tracks S&P CME Bitcoin Futures Daily Roll Index (200%), while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 2.38% for BITX and 0.19% for EZBC.
BITX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITX and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer