BITX vs. CBOL
BITX (2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITX is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the S&P CME Bitcoin Futures Daily Roll Index (200%), while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. BITX is passively managed, while CBOL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITX charges 2.38%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.
Performance
BITX vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITX achieves a -52.31% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -2.03% return.
BITX
- 1D
- -5.39%
- 1M
- -34.65%
- YTD
- -52.31%
- 6M
- -58.66%
- 1Y
- -73.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOL
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- -2.03%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITX vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITX 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -52.31% | -44.50% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | -2.03% | -2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITX and CBOL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITX vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank
BITX
CBOL
BITX vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITX | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITX | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | -1.80 | +1.84 |
Drawdowns
BITX vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITX drawdown since its inception was -78.92%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -4.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITX and CBOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITX | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.92% | -4.91% | -74.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.92% | -4.64% | -74.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -3.21% | -28.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.03% | — | — |
Volatility
BITX vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITX | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.83% | 3.88% | +82.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 98.27% | 3.88% | +94.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 98.27% | 3.88% | +94.39% |
BITX vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITX has a 2.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITX vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison
BITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.24%, more than CBOL's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BITX 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 33.24% | 21.69% | 10.70% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.83% | 1.79% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, BITX and CBOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CBOL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.38% for BITX.
BITX has the higher dividend yield at 33.24%, compared with 1.83% for CBOL.
BITX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 2.38% for BITX and 0.79% for CBOL.
Find the right allocation for BITX and CBOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer