BITW vs. SOEZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) and SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BITW is passively managed, while SOEZ is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOEZ.

Performance

BITW vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITW achieves a -30.14% return, which is significantly higher than SOEZ's -35.37% return.

BITW

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 1.81%
• 6M: -32.94%
• YTD: -30.14%
• 1Y: -43.69%
• 3Y*: 51.89%
• 5Y*: 0.52%
• 10Y*: —

SOEZ

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 17.32%
• 6M: -40.86%
• YTD: -35.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITW vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF	-30.14%	-3.70%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-35.37%	-11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BITW and SOEZ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

BITW vs. SOEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITW

BITW Risk / Return Rank: 3
BITW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BITW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BITW Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BITW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BITW Martin Ratio Rank: 3

SOEZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITW vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITW	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	—	—

Drawdowns

BITW vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITW drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than SOEZ's maximum drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITW and SOEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITW	SOEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.46%	-56.14%	-40.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.47%	-45.69%	-24.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.58%	-33.78%	-35.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.66%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BITW	SOEZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.73%	70.86%	-21.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.29%	70.86%	-5.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	107.95%	70.86%	+37.09%

BITW vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITW vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

BITW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.

Position	TTM
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF	0.00%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITW and SOEZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, BITW and SOEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BITW or SOEZ?

On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITW or SOEZ?

SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BITW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITW or SOEZ?

SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for BITW.

What is the main difference between BITW and SOEZ?

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BITW and 0.19% for SOEZ.