BITW vs. BSOL
BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) and BSOL (Bitwise Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Bitwise - BITW tracks the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index while BSOL tracks the Solana (SOL) spot price. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for BSOL.
Performance
BITW vs. BSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITW achieves a -30.09% return, which is significantly higher than BSOL's -39.88% return.
BITW
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -15.18%
- YTD
- -30.09%
- 6M
- -31.04%
- 1Y
- -33.61%
- 3Y*
- 53.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
BSOL
- 1D
- 4.89%
- 1M
- -13.58%
- YTD
- -39.88%
- 6M
- -39.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITW vs. BSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | -30.09% | -25.43% |
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF | -39.88% | -38.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITW and BSOL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITW vs. BSOL — Risk / Return Rank
BITW
BSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITW vs. BSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITW | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITW vs. BSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITW drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than BSOL's maximum drawdown of -67.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITW and BSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITW | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.46% | -67.62% | -28.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.45% | -62.79% | -7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.56% | -46.84% | -22.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.38% | — | — |
Volatility
BITW vs. BSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITW | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.88% | 76.28% | -26.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.58% | 76.28% | -10.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.37% | 76.28% | +32.09% |
BITW vs. BSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BSOL's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITW vs. BSOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BITW nor BSOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BITW and BSOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BSOL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSOL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BITW.
BITW and BSOL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BITW tracks Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index, while BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BITW and 0.20% for BSOL.
Find the right allocation for BITW and BSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer