PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITS vs. SETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITS vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 40.93% return.


BITS

1D
-2.94%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
4.17%
6M
-6.53%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
49.59%
5Y*
10Y*

SETH

1D
5.62%
1M
29.74%
YTD
40.93%
6M
46.51%
1Y
-1.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITS vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
4.17%14.90%61.84%47.79%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
40.93%-29.41%-49.59%-22.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and SETH is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

-0.75

The correlation between BITS and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.77 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITS vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS
BITS Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SETH
SETH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITSSETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.05

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

-0.02

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

-0.04

+0.79

BITS vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITSSETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

-0.02

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

-0.45

+0.46

Drawdowns

BITS vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, roughly equal to the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and SETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITSSETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.11%

-80.74%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.38%

-56.01%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.42%

-61.29%

+29.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.76%

-54.79%

+12.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.68%

35.77%

-10.09%

Volatility

BITS vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 12.83% compared to ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) at 9.81%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITSSETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.83%

9.81%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.38%

46.07%

-5.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.55%

68.54%

-15.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.91%

69.53%

-8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.91%

69.53%

-8.62%

BITS vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITS vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.88%, more than SETH's 10.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
21.88%22.80%29.49%13.69%0.48%1.90%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
10.91%7.01%3.44%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITS and SETH have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITS has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to SETH (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs SETH's -80.74%.

On 1-year performance, BITS leads with 19.33% vs -1.33% for SETH. On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITS has performed better with a 19.33% return vs -1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 21.88%, compared with 10.91% for SETH.

BITS tracks NONE, while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 0.95% for SETH.

BITS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITS and SETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer