BITS vs. EZBC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BITS tracks the NONE while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BITS returned 16.16% vs -39.76% for EZBC. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

BITS vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -28.83% return.

BITS

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: -9.90%
• YTD: -1.05%
• 6M: -4.96%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 41.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: -17.79%
• YTD: -28.83%
• 6M: -28.96%
• 1Y: -39.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITS vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-1.05%	14.90%	57.29%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-28.83%	-6.56%	87.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and EZBC is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.87

The correlation between BITS and EZBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BITS vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS

BITS Risk / Return Rank: 13
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 11

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITS	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	-0.90	+1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	-1.26	+2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.86	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	-0.77	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.60	-1.30	+1.91

BITS vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITS vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITS	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.11%	-52.07%	-31.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.38%	-52.07%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.86%	-50.46%	+15.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.63%	-16.89%	-25.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.82%	30.56%	-3.74%

Volatility

BITS vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) at 13.04%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITS	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.66%	13.04%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.96%	34.61%	+6.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.22%	44.23%	+8.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.86%	50.15%	+10.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.86%	50.15%	+10.71%

BITS vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITS vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.04%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	23.04%	22.80%	29.49%	13.69%	0.48%	1.90%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITS and EZBC in my portfolio?

BITS and EZBC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITS or EZBC?

BITS has higher volatility (14.66%) compared to EZBC (13.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs EZBC's -52.07%.

Which ETF is better, BITS or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, BITS leads with 16.16% vs -39.76% for EZBC. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZBC has been the lower-risk option at 13.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITS or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, BITS has performed better with a 16.16% return vs -39.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITS or EZBC?

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITS or EZBC?

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 23.04%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

What is the main difference between BITS and EZBC?

BITS tracks NONE, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 0.19% for EZBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.