BITS vs. BTC
BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BITS is passively managed, while BTC is actively managed. Over the past year, BITS returned 16.16% vs -39.75% for BTC. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BTC.
Performance
BITS vs. BTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than BTC's -28.84% return.
BITS
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -9.90%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -4.96%
- 1Y
- 16.16%
- 3Y*
- 41.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTC
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- -17.80%
- YTD
- -28.84%
- 6M
- -28.95%
- 1Y
- -39.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITS vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -1.05% | 14.90% | 24.22% |
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | -28.84% | -7.50% | 41.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITS and BTC is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between BITS and BTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITS vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank
BITS
BTC
BITS vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITS | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.86 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | -0.77 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.60 | -1.30 | +1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITS vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than BTC's maximum drawdown of -51.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and BTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITS | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.11% | -51.97% | -31.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.38% | -51.97% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.86% | -50.40% | +15.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.63% | -17.66% | -24.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.82% | 30.52% | -3.70% |
Volatility
BITS vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) at 12.93%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITS | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.66% | 12.93% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.96% | 34.58% | +6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.22% | 44.23% | +8.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.86% | 48.26% | +12.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.86% | 48.26% | +12.60% |
BITS vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITS vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison
BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.04%, while BTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 23.04% | 22.80% | 29.49% | 13.69% | 0.48% | 1.90% |
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITS and BTC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITS has higher volatility (14.66%) compared to BTC (12.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs BTC's -51.97%.
On 1-year performance, BITS leads with 16.16% vs -39.75% for BTC. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BTC has been the lower-risk option at 12.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BITS has performed better with a 16.16% return vs -39.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITS.
BITS has the higher dividend yield at 23.04%, compared with 0.00% for BTC.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 0.15% for BTC.
BITS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITS and BTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer