BITS vs. AIQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITS is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the NONE, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BITS returned 41.04%/yr vs 32.41%/yr for AIQ. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.

Performance

BITS vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 24.56% return.

BITS

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: -9.90%
• YTD: -1.05%
• 6M: -4.96%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 41.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIQ

• 1D: -5.57%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 24.56%
• 6M: 23.60%
• 1Y: 51.28%
• 3Y*: 32.41%
• 5Y*: 16.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITS vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-1.05%	14.90%	61.84%	212.23%	-75.46%	-28.96%
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	24.56%	31.89%	24.11%	55.39%	-36.44%	-3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and AIQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021	0.61

The correlation between BITS and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BITS vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS

BITS Risk / Return Rank: 13
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 11

AIQ

AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITS	AIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	1.94	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	2.44	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.34	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	3.13	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.60	10.06	-9.45

BITS vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITS vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and AIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITS	AIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.11%	-44.66%	-38.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.38%	-16.47%	-31.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.38%	-26.35%	-22.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.86%	-9.68%	-25.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.63%	-9.78%	-32.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.82%	5.11%	+21.71%

Volatility

BITS vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) have volatilities of 14.66% and 15.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITS	AIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.66%	15.10%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.96%	22.68%	+18.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.22%	26.54%	+26.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.86%	26.01%	+34.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.86%	25.84%	+35.02%

BITS vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITS vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.04%, more than AIQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	0.15%	0.18%	0.14%	0.16%	0.56%	0.15%	0.50%	0.51%	0.51%
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	23.04%	22.80%	29.49%	13.69%	0.48%	1.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITS and AIQ in my portfolio?

BITS and AIQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITS or AIQ?

AIQ has higher volatility (15.10%) compared to BITS (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

Which ETF is better, BITS or AIQ?

On 3-year performance, BITS leads with 41.04% vs 32.41% for AIQ. On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BITS has been the lower-risk option at 14.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITS or AIQ?

Over the 3-year period, BITS has performed better with a 41.04% return vs 32.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITS or AIQ?

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITS or AIQ?

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 23.04%, compared with 0.15% for AIQ.

What is the main difference between BITS and AIQ?

BITS is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while AIQ is Technology Equities. BITS tracks NONE, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 0.68% for AIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.