BITQ vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BITQ returned 53.75% vs 211.40% for CHPS. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

BITQ vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 37.93% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 103.69% return.

BITQ

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 37.93%
• 6M: 16.04%
• 1Y: 53.75%
• 3Y*: 60.76%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 23.46%
• YTD: 103.69%
• 6M: 107.58%
• 1Y: 211.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITQ vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	37.93%	18.00%	46.97%	5.16%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	103.69%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and CHPS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.50

The correlation between BITQ and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITQ vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BITQ	CHPS
Financial Services	67.1%	0.2%
Technology	28.1%	98.8%
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BITQ vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ

BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 27
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITQ	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	6.17	-5.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	5.85	-4.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.78	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	12.16	-10.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.53	47.22	-44.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITQ vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITQ	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	6.17	-5.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	1.77	-1.70

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITQ	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.32%	-39.44%	-50.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.99%	-17.50%	-27.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.21%	-2.06%	-13.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.77%	-9.15%	-43.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.33%	4.50%	+16.83%

Volatility

BITQ vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) have volatilities of 14.24% and 14.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITQ	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.24%	14.07%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.58%	28.29%	+14.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.93%	34.50%	+21.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.18%	33.78%	+33.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.21%	33.78%	+33.43%

BITQ vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITQ vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.90%	1.51%	0.00%	3.12%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.33%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITQ and CHPS in my portfolio?

BITQ and CHPS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITQ or CHPS?

BITQ has higher volatility (14.24%) compared to CHPS (14.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, BITQ or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 211.40% vs 53.75% for BITQ. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CHPS has been the lower-risk option at 14.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITQ or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 211.40% return vs 53.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITQ or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITQ or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

What is the main difference between BITQ and CHPS?

BITQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. BITQ tracks Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.17 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.