BITQ vs. CBTJ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Blockchain funds. BITQ is passively managed, while CBTJ is actively managed. Over the past year, BITQ returned 10.66% vs -37.79% for CBTJ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBTJ.

Performance

BITQ vs. CBTJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than CBTJ's -18.22% return.

BITQ

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -11.99%
• 6M: -0.04%
• YTD: 18.26%
• 1Y: 10.66%
• 3Y*: 31.35%
• 5Y*: 4.48%
• 10Y*: —

CBTJ

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -0.33%
• 6M: -23.82%
• YTD: -18.22%
• 1Y: -37.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITQ vs. CBTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	18.26%	9.63%
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-18.22%	-11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and CBTJ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025	0.68

The correlation between BITQ and CBTJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BITQ vs. CBTJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ

BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 13
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CBTJ

CBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
CBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. CBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITQ	CBTJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	-1.42	+1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	-2.13	+2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.77	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	-0.89	+1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	-1.40	+1.88

BITQ vs. CBTJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the CBTJ Sharpe Ratio of -1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and CBTJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. CBTJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than CBTJ's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and CBTJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITQ	CBTJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.32%	-42.41%	-47.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.99%	-42.41%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.30%	-40.31%	+13.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.23%	-17.01%	-35.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.02%	27.12%	-5.10%

Volatility

BITQ vs. CBTJ - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 12.18% compared to Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) at 4.64%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBTJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITQ	CBTJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.18%	4.64%	+7.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.48%	17.32%	+25.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.13%	26.76%	+30.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.31%	25.04%	+42.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.04%	25.04%	+42.00%

BITQ vs. CBTJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CBTJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITQ vs. CBTJ - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.90%	1.51%	0.00%	3.12%
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	1.77%	1.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITQ and CBTJ in my portfolio?

BITQ and CBTJ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITQ or CBTJ?

BITQ has higher volatility (12.18%) compared to CBTJ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs CBTJ's -42.41%.

Which ETF is better, BITQ or CBTJ?

On 1-year performance, BITQ leads with 10.66% vs -37.79% for CBTJ. On fees, CBTJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBTJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITQ or CBTJ?

Over the 1-year period, BITQ has performed better with a 10.66% return vs -37.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITQ or CBTJ?

CBTJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITQ or CBTJ?

CBTJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

What is the main difference between BITQ and CBTJ?

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.69% for CBTJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.