BITQ vs. ARKD
BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and ARKD (ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return, while ARKD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ARK. BITQ is passively managed, while ARKD is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for ARKD.
Performance
BITQ vs. ARKD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BITQ
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 37.93%
- 6M
- 16.04%
- 1Y
- 53.75%
- 3Y*
- 60.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKD
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITQ vs. ARKD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 29.43% |
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | -0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITQ and ARKD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITQ vs. ARKD — Risk / Return Rank
BITQ
ARKD
BITQ vs. ARKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITQ | ARKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITQ | ARKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.04 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
BITQ vs. ARKD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than ARKD's maximum drawdown of -14.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and ARKD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITQ | ARKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.32% | -14.03% | -76.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.21% | -2.83% | -12.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.77% | -6.18% | -46.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.33% | — | — |
Volatility
BITQ vs. ARKD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITQ | ARKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.93% | 19.90% | +36.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.18% | 19.90% | +47.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.21% | 19.90% | +47.31% |
BITQ vs. ARKD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKD's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITQ vs. ARKD - Dividend Comparison
Neither BITQ nor ARKD has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITQ and ARKD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BITQ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BITQ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.
BITQ and ARKD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BITQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while ARKD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.90% for ARKD.
Find the right allocation for BITQ and ARKD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer