BITO vs. WGMI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BITO returned 26.82%/yr vs 88.52%/yr for WGMI. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.

Performance

BITO vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITO achieves a -28.44% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 81.24% return.

BITO

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: -22.52%
• YTD: -28.44%
• 6M: -32.46%
• 1Y: -41.98%
• 3Y*: 26.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WGMI

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: 25.79%
• YTD: 81.24%
• 6M: 46.67%
• 1Y: 261.44%
• 3Y*: 88.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITO vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-28.44%	-11.19%	104.45%	137.33%	-62.64%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	81.24%	72.47%	23.54%	304.08%	-83.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BITO and WGMI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022	0.68

The correlation between BITO and WGMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BITO vs. WGMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BITO	WGMI
Financial Services	68.5%	51.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	45.9%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

BITO vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 77
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITO vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITO	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	3.48	-4.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.39	3.30	-4.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.40	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	5.17	-6.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	10.48	-11.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITO vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITO Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITO and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITO	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.97	3.48	-4.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.30	-0.40

Drawdowns

BITO vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITO	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.86%	-85.76%	+7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.64%	-50.94%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.64%	-62.79%	+12.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.64%	-3.01%	-47.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.75%	-42.86%	+6.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.27%	25.08%	+4.19%

Volatility

BITO vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) is 9.03%, while Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 18.90%. This indicates that BITO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITO	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.03%	18.90%	-9.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.71%	55.08%	-21.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.61%	75.99%	-32.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.10%	81.50%	-26.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.10%	81.50%	-26.40%

BITO vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITO vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.59%, while WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	69.59%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITO and WGMI in my portfolio?

BITO and WGMI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITO or WGMI?

WGMI has higher volatility (18.90%) compared to BITO (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITO dropped -77.86% vs WGMI's -85.76%.

Which ETF is better, BITO or WGMI?

On 3-year performance, WGMI leads with 88.52% vs 26.82% for BITO. On fees, WGMI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITO or WGMI?

Over the 3-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 88.52% return vs 26.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITO or WGMI?

WGMI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITO or WGMI?

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 69.59%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between BITO and WGMI?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Valkyrie. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITO and 0.75% for WGMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.