BITO vs. SBIT
BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares. BITO is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, BITO returned -41.01% vs 68.00% for SBIT. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
BITO vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITO achieves a -26.37% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 37.02% return.
BITO
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -18.61%
- YTD
- -26.37%
- 6M
- -30.81%
- 1Y
- -41.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- 46.58%
- YTD
- 37.02%
- 6M
- 52.37%
- 1Y
- 68.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITO vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -26.37% | -11.19% | 33.93% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 37.02% | -25.11% | -73.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITO and SBIT is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -1.00 |
The correlation between BITO and SBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITO vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
BITO
SBIT
BITO vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITO | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.18 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 1.43 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 2.76 | -4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITO | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | 0.78 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | -0.46 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
BITO vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITO | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.86% | -91.35% | +13.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.05% | -47.94% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.22% | -78.26% | +29.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.73% | -68.55% | +31.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.09% | 24.69% | +4.40% |
Volatility
BITO vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) is 9.43%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.22%. This indicates that BITO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITO | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.43% | 18.22% | -8.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.26% | 68.46% | -34.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.57% | 87.18% | -43.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.11% | 97.47% | -42.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.11% | 97.47% | -42.36% |
BITO vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BITO and SBIT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
BITO vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.63%, more than SBIT's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 67.63% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.42% | 0.52% | 1.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITO and SBIT have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to BITO (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITO dropped -77.86% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 68.00% vs -41.01% for BITO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 68.00% return vs -41.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITO and SBIT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 67.63%, compared with 3.42% for SBIT.
SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITO and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer