BITO vs. EZBC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC).

BITO and EZBC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BITO is an actively managed fund by ProShares. It was launched on Oct 19, 2021. EZBC is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jan 11, 2024.

Performance

BITO vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BITO vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-22.79%	-11.19%	87.60%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-22.09%	-6.56%	100.18%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BITO having a -22.79% return and EZBC slightly higher at -22.09%.

BITO

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -1.72%
• YTD: -22.79%
• 6M: -43.10%
• 1Y: -23.27%
• 3Y*: 24.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: -22.09%
• 6M: -42.07%
• 1Y: -19.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITO vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.

BITO

ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF

EZBC

Franklin Bitcoin ETF

Return for Risk

BITO vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 5
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 6
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITO vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITO	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	-0.44	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	-0.37	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.96	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	-0.35	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.89	-0.75	-0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITO vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITO Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is comparable to the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITO and EZBC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITO	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	-0.44	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.36	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between BITO and EZBC is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BITO vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.47%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	80.47%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BITO vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITO	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.86%	-49.37%	-28.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.05%	-49.37%	-0.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.75%	-45.77%	-0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.57%	-14.18%	-22.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.73%	23.25%	+0.48%

Volatility

BITO vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) have volatilities of 12.84% and 13.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITO	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.84%	13.02%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.71%	36.81%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.32%	45.37%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.77%	51.08%	+4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.77%	51.08%	+4.69%