BITO vs. CBOO
BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
BITO vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITO achieves a -28.44% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's -0.04% return.
BITO
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- -22.52%
- YTD
- -28.44%
- 6M
- -32.46%
- 1Y
- -41.98%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITO vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -28.44% | -28.83% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -0.04% | -1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITO and CBOO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITO vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
BITO
CBOO
BITO vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITO | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITO | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | -1.19 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
BITO vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITO | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.86% | -2.34% | -75.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.64% | -1.72% | -48.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.75% | -1.61% | -35.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.27% | — | — |
Volatility
BITO vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITO | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.61% | 2.14% | +41.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.10% | 2.14% | +52.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.10% | 2.14% | +52.96% |
BITO vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITO vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.59%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 69.59% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITO and CBOO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 69.59%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.
BITO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITO and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for BITO and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer