BITI vs. IBLC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BITI (ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BITI tracks the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-100%) while IBLC tracks the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BITI returned -34.09%/yr vs 48.31%/yr for IBLC. At a correlation of -0.71, they often move in opposite directions. BITI charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.

Performance

BITI vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITI achieves a 24.06% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.34% return.

BITI

• 1D: 2.69%
• 1M: 22.00%
• YTD: 24.06%
• 6M: 31.50%
• 1Y: 45.79%
• 3Y*: -34.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBLC

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 13.52%
• YTD: 32.34%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 73.27%
• 3Y*: 48.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITI vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF	24.06%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	-0.06%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	32.34%	27.05%	18.58%	201.47%	-30.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BITI and IBLC is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	-0.71

The correlation between BITI and IBLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.71 to -0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITI vs. IBLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BITI	IBLC
Financial Services	28.5%	66.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	30.7%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

BITI vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 30
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 27

IBLC

IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 33
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITI vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITI	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.34	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	1.92	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.23	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	1.64	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.89	3.26	+0.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITI vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITI Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the IBLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITI and IBLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITI	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	1.34	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.72	0.40	-1.12

Drawdowns

BITI vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITI drawdown since its inception was -92.16%, which is greater than IBLC's maximum drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITI and IBLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITI	IBLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.16%	-62.54%	-29.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.28%	-44.94%	+19.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.63%	-51.68%	-32.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.46%	-12.99%	-73.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.95%	-25.89%	-42.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.80%	22.56%	-10.76%

Volatility

BITI vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI) is 9.29%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that BITI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITI	IBLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.29%	14.67%	-5.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.02%	40.76%	-6.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.52%	54.94%	-11.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.50%	64.49%	-11.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.50%	64.49%	-11.99%

BITI vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITI has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITI vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%, more than IBLC's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF	9.52%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	4.77%	6.31%	1.60%	1.79%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITI and IBLC in my portfolio?

BITI and IBLC have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITI or IBLC?

IBLC has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to BITI (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITI dropped -92.16% vs IBLC's -62.54%.

Which ETF is better, BITI or IBLC?

On 3-year performance, IBLC leads with 48.31% vs -34.09% for BITI. On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 9.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITI or IBLC?

Over the 3-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 48.31% return vs -34.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITI or IBLC?

IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITI or IBLC?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 9.52%, compared with 4.77% for IBLC.

What is the main difference between BITI and IBLC?

BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-100%), while IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for BITI and 0.47% for IBLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.