BITI vs. BFOC
BITI (ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-100%), while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. BITI is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. BITI charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
BITI vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITI achieves a 24.06% return, which is significantly higher than BFOC's -7.39% return.
BITI
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- 22.00%
- YTD
- 24.06%
- 6M
- 31.50%
- 1Y
- 45.79%
- 3Y*
- -34.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITI vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF | 24.06% | 30.31% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.39% | -9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITI and BFOC is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | -0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITI vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
BITI
BFOC
BITI vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITI | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITI | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | -1.88 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
BITI vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITI drawdown since its inception was -92.16%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITI and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITI | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.16% | -18.20% | -73.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.46% | -18.20% | -68.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.95% | -12.52% | -55.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.80% | — | — |
Volatility
BITI vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITI | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.52% | 12.61% | +30.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.50% | 12.61% | +39.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.50% | 12.61% | +39.89% |
BITI vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITI has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITI vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF | 9.52% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITI and BFOC have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 9.52%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
BITI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for BITI and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for BITI and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer