BITC vs. WGMI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BITC returned 27.90%/yr vs 43.46%/yr for WGMI. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITC charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.

Performance

BITC vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC achieves a -2.70% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 36.58% return.

BITC

• 1D: -2.63%
• 1M: -9.11%
• 6M: -4.20%
• YTD: -2.70%
• 1Y: -26.25%
• 3Y*: 27.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WGMI

• 1D: -5.82%
• 1M: -20.77%
• 6M: 9.97%
• YTD: 36.58%
• 1Y: 110.94%
• 3Y*: 43.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITC vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF	-2.70%	-20.46%	97.86%	42.71%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	36.58%	72.47%	23.54%	112.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BITC and WGMI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2023	0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between BITC and WGMI has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BITC vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC

BITC Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 48
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITC	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.06	1.44	-2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.46	2.04	-3.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.24	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	2.19	-3.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	4.37	-5.69

BITC vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITC vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITC	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.51%	-85.76%	+47.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.89%	-50.94%	+23.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.51%	-62.79%	+24.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.13%	-27.50%	-5.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.75%	-42.15%	+25.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.87%	25.51%	-5.64%

Volatility

BITC vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) is 6.65%, while CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 22.33%. This indicates that BITC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITC	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	22.33%	-15.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.15%	56.04%	-36.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.83%	77.66%	-52.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.05%	81.54%	-35.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.05%	81.54%	-35.49%

BITC vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITC has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITC vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, while WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF	3.46%	3.36%	42.68%	5.82%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITC and WGMI in my portfolio?

BITC and WGMI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITC or WGMI?

WGMI has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to BITC (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITC dropped -38.51% vs WGMI's -85.76%.

Which ETF is better, BITC or WGMI?

On 3-year performance, WGMI leads with 43.46% vs 27.90% for BITC. On fees, WGMI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BITC has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITC or WGMI?

Over the 3-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 43.46% return vs 27.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITC or WGMI?

WGMI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for BITC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITC or WGMI?

BITC has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between BITC and WGMI?

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for BITC and 0.75% for WGMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.