PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITC vs. BTCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITC vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 40.86% return.


BITC

1D
-3.33%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
3.58%
6M
3.49%
1Y
-13.86%
3Y*
28.98%
5Y*
10Y*

BTCZ

1D
6.37%
1M
40.52%
YTD
40.86%
6M
41.38%
1Y
59.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITC vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.58%-20.46%55.77%
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
40.86%-29.11%-76.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BITC and BTCZ is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024

-0.68

The correlation between BITC and BTCZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.68 (all time) to -0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITC vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITCBTCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.17

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

1.21

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.73

2.49

-3.22

BITC vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC and BTCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITC vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC and BTCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITCBTCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-91.06%

+52.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

-49.02%

+22.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.82%

-77.28%

+48.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.51%

-73.68%

+57.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.94%

24.87%

-5.93%

Volatility

BITC vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) is 3.42%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 26.49%. This indicates that BITC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITCBTCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

26.49%

-23.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.00%

68.94%

-49.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.12%

88.72%

-63.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.29%

97.08%

-50.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.29%

97.08%

-50.79%

BITC vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITC has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITC vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.25%3.36%42.68%5.82%
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITC and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCZ has higher volatility (26.49%) compared to BITC (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITC dropped -38.51% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.

On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 59.01% vs -13.86% for BITC. On fees, BITC is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, BITC has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 59.01% return vs -13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITC is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.

BITC has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for BITC and 0.95% for BTCZ.

BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITC and BTCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer